In a move that sounds like something out of a tech utopia, the exchange has announced its plans to embrace tokenized securities and round-the-clock trading. That’s right; while you’re binge-watching your favorite show, the stock market could be doing its own thing-trading away 24/7 like an over-caffeinated squirrel! 🐿️💼
I’m looking at Alphabet (GOOG 0.85%) (GOOGL 0.80%) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM +0.25%). They’re both doing things that seem…necessary. Like air and water. And they’re both making a lot of money doing it. Which, let’s be honest, is the whole point, isn’t it?
Now, I’m not sayin’ Walmart’s a bad company. Far from it! They’re sellin’ everything from bananas to bazookas…well, not bazookas, but you get the idea. They’ve managed to grow, even with the economy doin’ the cha-cha one minute and the limbo the next. Resilience? They got it in spades! But a price-to-earnings ratio in the forties? That’s where I start lookin’ for the hidden camera. It’s like payin’ a million bucks for a slightly used hot dog. A very good hot dog, mind you, but still…
Both of these funds are supposed to give you a slice of the ‘essential goods’ pie. Things people buy even when, you know, the world is ending. But they go about it differently. PBJ is a curated selection; KXI is more of a ‘everything but the kitchen sink’ approach. We’ll dig into that, because frankly, I’m nosy, and you probably are too.
As of the sixteenth of January, the stock hovers around the sixty-two dollar mark. The question, then, is less about its current price and more about its trajectory. Can it ascend to the hundred-dollar plateau before 2026 breathes its last? A perfectly round number, a psychological barrier, and a tempting target for the bulls.
The company itself is a study in adaptation. A century ago, it built the bones of the American truck. Now, it whispers of electric vehicles and the ever-increasing demand for electricity. A sensible evolution, perhaps, but one cannot help but wonder if, in shedding its past, it has also lost something of its character. The pursuit of relevance, it seems, often demands a sacrifice.
For ’tis not merely the quantity of coin that fills the coffers, but the quality thereof. A deluge of small gains is but a fleeting pleasure; a steady stream of substantial profits, now that is a treasure to be coveted. BYD, it seems, has mastered the art of the multitude, but can they also master the art of margin?
During this brief interval, the token has fluctuated between the modest confines of $0.36 and $0.40, whilst its broader range over the past week has oscillated from $0.36 to a mere $0.43. Market pressures, one might say, have intensified, exacerbated by renewed tensions between the European Union and our friends across the Atlantic in the United States, thus adding to the general retreat seen among digital assets.
Both are wrestling with slowing sales and, shall we say, a persistent lack of profitability. Throw in rising interest rates, and their valuations have taken a hit. Now, as someone who likes a good dividend (and let’s be real, these aren’t paying dividends anytime soon), I’m always looking for a turnaround story. But is either of these companies a worthwhile gamble, or are we just throwing good money after bad? Let’s dig in, because I need a distraction from my 401k.
For a considerable period, Intel enjoyed a position of unchallenged leadership, a circumstance which, while enviable, often breeds a certain complacency. However, the tides of innovation, as they are wont to do, have shifted, and Taiwan Semiconductor, or TSMC as it is more familiarly known, now occupies a most advantageous position. To declare, therefore, that a consideration of TSMC is the more sensible course for an investment in 2026, is not to disparage Intel, but merely to acknowledge the present disposition of the field.