Lululemon’s Founder: A Shareholder’s Grumble

by

Lululemon Athletica, purveyor of remarkably expensive stretchy trousers and a whole lifestyle around them, is a curious case. It’s become a dominant force in the ‘athleisure’ category – a word that always strikes me as faintly ridiculous, as if clothing has suddenly developed a penchant for leisure activities – yet the stock price, over the last five years, has been performing with the enthusiasm of a sloth on a winter morning. Down around 40%, and more than 60% off its peak. Which, in the normally relentlessly upward-sloping world of retail, is a bit like discovering that water isn’t wet.

Now, Dennis Wilson, the chap who actually started the whole thing, isn’t thrilled. And when a founder gets disgruntled, particularly when they still hold a significant pile of shares, it’s generally worth a moment of your attention. He’s sent a letter to shareholders outlining his concerns, and it’s a surprisingly engaging read, mostly because it’s a reminder that even in the seemingly sterile world of high finance, human emotions – annoyance, pride, a sense of ownership – still play a role.

Let’s unpack it, shall we? Here are a few things to consider, viewed through the slightly cynical but hopefully discerning eye of a value investor.

1. The Founder’s Lament

Wilson’s position is, naturally, colored by the fact he’s no longer at the helm. He was, shall we say, ‘encouraged’ to move on in 2013. It wasn’t a smooth exit, and it’s reasonable to assume he views the current board with a degree of suspicion – perhaps even regarding them as the people who’ve mislaid ‘his’ company. That’s the potentially biased view. However, and this is where it gets interesting for us, he is still a substantial shareholder. His wealth, like that of all Lululemon investors, has taken a hit. So, his complaints aren’t simply the grumbling of a displaced executive; they’re the concerns of someone with a significant financial stake in the company’s future.

It’s a bit like finding out the architect of your house thinks the new paint job is a disaster. You might not agree, but you’d probably listen to their reasoning, wouldn’t you? Especially if they’d designed the house in the first place.

2. A Board with a View (or Lack Thereof?)

Wilson’s primary complaint centers on the composition of the board. He believes it lacks sufficient expertise in the areas that made Lululemon successful: brand, creativity, and, crucially, understanding what people actually want to wear while pretending to be athletic. He has a point. A board packed with accountants and lawyers – perfectly competent individuals, to be sure – might be excellent at managing numbers, but they might struggle to grasp the subtle art of convincing people they need $120 yoga pants.

Loading widget...

Now, companies rarely welcome unsolicited advice, and Lululemon is likely pushing back. But even if they dismiss Wilson’s concerns, investors should pay attention. A strong board, with a genuine understanding of the business, is a vital component of any successful company.

3. Patience, Young Padawan

Wilson claims Lululemon is being unresponsive. Lululemon claims it isn’t. It’s the classic corporate dance of denial and deflection. Boardroom battles are rarely swift or elegant. They can drag on for months, even years, and often result in little more than bruised egos and legal fees. Wilson, while a significant shareholder, isn’t exactly wielding a majority vote. He’s essentially shouting from the sidelines, hoping someone will listen.

So, should you buy or sell Lululemon stock based on this little drama? Probably not. But it’s a useful reminder that a declining stock price isn’t always a sign of a fundamentally flawed business. Sometimes, it’s simply a symptom of internal friction. The stock’s valuation – price-to-sales, price-to-earnings, price-to-book – is currently below its five-year average, which suggests it might be undervalued. But, as any seasoned investor knows, cheap for a reason is often a very good reason indeed.

Read More

2026-03-04 10:33