And lo, First Majestic, a company dedicated to the extraction of this precious metal, has soared even higher, boasting an increase of 364 percent over the same period. One is compelled to ask: is this a prudent investment, or merely a fleeting fancy, a bubble inflated by the breath of speculation? Let us, with a historian’s eye and a touch of worldly wisdom, examine the matter.
In a recent post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, analyst Ali Martinez shared a daily price chart of Bitcoin. The chart illustrates a crossover between two simple moving averages (SMAs)-those of 21 and 50 days. SMAs, as any student of statistics knows, serve to smooth out the jagged edges of price fluctuations, offering a clearer view of long-term trends.
Still, a smaller market capitalization – around $2.6 billion at last count – does leave room for expansion. It’s a bit like having a slightly less crowded beach to build your sandcastle on. Recently, they’ve made a splash with an acquisition that might, just might, give them a boost, particularly in the rather sensitive world of defense and highly regulated industries. The question, naturally, is whether this deal is a genuine turning point, or just another ripple in the vast ocean of tech stocks. Does it make BigBear.ai a better buy today? Let’s poke around a bit.
The shares were up a modest 5% in 2025. Not exactly a rocket ship, is it? But then, January 27th saw a little bump – 6% in 2026. Progress, I suppose. Though, defining ‘progress’ feels increasingly subjective these days. Units of Stock Watched: 1. Hours Spent Refreshing Financial News: 7. Attempts to Explain ‘EV/EBIT’ to Relatives: 3 (all unsuccessful).
Both funds, it is asserted, target the technology sector. A convenient categorization. As if the vast, amorphous entity known as ‘technology’ could be neatly contained within the boundaries of a portfolio. [XLK] spreads its tendrils across the established giants, a seemingly diversified approach. [CHAT], however, concentrates its resources on a single, volatile current – a gamble predicated on the continuation of a prevailing enthusiasm. The logic, if one can call it that, appears to be this: isolate the trend, amplify the exposure, and pray the trend does not…dissipate.
This chap, Leshka.eth (sounds like a sneeze, doesn’t it?), has been peering at charts – a perfectly ghastly way to spend one’s time, if you ask me – and he reckons the current ETH/BTC thingamajig is a dead ringer for the 2015-2018 period. Apparently, it goes up, it goes down, it does a little jig, and then… UP AGAIN! The cheek of it.
For years, Japan was stuck in what they politely called a “period of adjustment.” I call it a decades-long nap! But the Nikkei 225? It’s woken up! Reached a new high, folks. A new high! And the Tokyo Stock Price Index, the TOPIX? Up 93.3% in five years! Beats the S&P 500 by a country mile. The S&P, bless its heart, only managed 79.2%. It’s like watching a tortoise race a caffeinated cheetah. And I, as a seasoned dividend hunter, am very interested in cheetahs.
The U.S. government, in a move that suggests either remarkable foresight or a profound misunderstanding of economics, took a 9.9% stake. Followed by Nvidia, who, in a display of either generosity or strategic maneuvering, invested five billion dollars. (Five billion dollars. It’s a number, isn’t it? A large one. It could buy a lot of tea.) This infusion of capital is intended to propel Intel’s foundry business and its fledgling AI endeavors. The new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, is attempting to streamline operations, reduce costs, and generally make the company less… bureaucratic. (Imagine a bureaucracy trying not to be bureaucratic. The inherent paradox is quite delightful.)
Revenue came in at $4.42 billion, a ten percent rise year over year. Close, but not quite the $4.45 billion the analysts were expecting. Earnings per share dipped two percent to $1.27, falling short of the predicted $1.29. They tacked on a six-cent hit for some accounting adjustments, the usual corporate housekeeping. But numbers, like faces, can lie. And the street wasn’t interested in the past, only the direction.
The stock emerged in 2021, blinking in the harsh light of the market. Since then, it’s mostly stumbled, despite a persistent, almost stubborn growth. Two-thirds of its initial promise has evaporated, discarded like a worn-out boot. The numbers, however, tell a different tale, a quiet defiance.
