XRP Ledger’s Near-Miss: A Bug That Could’ve Made You Poor Overnight!

A monstrous flaw, cloaked in the garb of progress, slithered through the XRP Ledger’s code this month-a digital hydra narrowly beheaded by a blog post and an AI named Apex. One might call it a “close call,” though the term feels almost charitable.

Researchers, armed with caffeine and algorithms, unearthed a vulnerability so egregious it could have let thieves drain wallets like a modern-day Robin Hood, sans the moral compass. All without needing a private key-because who needs passwords when you can just… ask nicely?

The culprit? A proposed “Batch” amendment (XLS-56), a feature so ambitious it forgot to check if the doors were locked. Independent researcher Pranamya Keshkamat and Apex, the AI with a flair for drama, caught the glitch just as it was slipping into the mainnet’s embrace. One can only imagine the amendment’s existential crisis upon realizing it was about to become a cautionary tale.

HOT Stories
Critical XRP Ledger Bug in Batch Amendment Could Have Drained User Wallets

Crypto Market Review: XRP Volatility Squeeze is a $2 Recipe, Will Dogecoin (DOGE) Zero Removal Happen in February? Shiba Inu (SHIB) Bullruns Aren’t Possible Yet

The amendment, still in its bureaucratic infancy (read: voting phase), had not yet infected the mainnet. Thus, no funds were lost-though one suspects the ledger itself may have shed a tear of relief.

The vulnerability explained

The Batch amendment, a would-be savior of processing power, proposed grouping transactions like a digital Tupperware party. These inner transactions, left unsigned to save effort, delegated their fate to the batch’s signers-trust being the new black in a world of code.

But here lies the rub: a loop error turned the system into a bouncer who checks IDs only if the guest is already famous. If a signer matched a non-existent account, the ledger threw its hands up and declared, “Valid! Now, next!”-all while skipping the usual security drills.

An attacker, armed with the right sequence of transactions, could have exploited this farce to steal funds, rewrite history, and leave the ecosystem gasping for stability. Fortunately, the amendment’s activation date was postponed-thanks to the same bureaucracy that once delayed your tax refund.

This week, developers released Rippled 3.1.1, a patch so urgent it probably sprinted to the finish line. It now brands the Batch amendment as “unsupported,” a digital excommunication. A fix, involving loop rewrites and tighter guards, is under review-because peer review is the closest thing to democracy in decentralized finance.

Read More

2026-02-27 09:25