Quantum Leaps & Stock Risks: A Skeptic’s View

by

The pursuit of the next big thing in technology is, historically, a bit like chasing rainbows. Lots of enthusiasm, a fair bit of investment, and a surprisingly small number of pots of gold at the end. Right now, the rainbow everyone’s staring at is quantum computing. It’s touted as revolutionary, world-altering, and potentially capable of making your current computer look like an abacus. Which, incidentally, is still a perfectly good calculating device if you have enough patience and a knack for beads. But can investing in a company attempting this technological moonshot actually “set you up for life”? That’s what some are suggesting about IonQ. Let’s unpack that, shall we?

The basic idea behind quantum computing is delightfully strange. Regular computers use bits, which are either 0 or 1. Quantum computers use qubits. Qubits, thanks to a phenomenon called superposition, can be both 0 and 1 at the same time. It’s like flipping a coin that’s still spinning in the air – it’s neither heads nor tails until it lands. This allows quantum computers to explore many possibilities simultaneously, which, in theory, could solve problems that are currently intractable for even the most powerful supercomputers. The problem is, maintaining that spinning-coin state is fiendishly difficult. The slightest vibration, temperature change, or even a particularly grumpy observer can cause the qubit to “decohere” – to fall flat, so to speak – and give you a meaningless answer. It’s a bit like trying to build a house of cards during an earthquake.

Loading widget...

IonQ: A Quantum Contender

One of the companies attempting to tame this quantum beast is IonQ (IONQ 7.25%). They’ve taken a slightly different tack than many competitors, opting to use trapped ions – that is, individual atoms – as their qubits. The logic is that atoms, being, well, atoms, are remarkably consistent. Unlike lab-grown qubits, which can vary in quality, each atom is essentially identical to the next. It’s a bit like building with Lego bricks versus trying to sculpt something from clay – one is predictably uniform, the other… less so. They’ve also been moving toward using microwave electronics to control the ions, which, according to IonQ, provides more stability than relying on lasers. Apparently, lasers can be a bit temperamental. Who knew?

IonQ has achieved a reported two-gate fidelity of 99.99%, which sounds impressive until you realize that even a tiny error rate can accumulate in complex calculations. It’s like aiming for a bullseye – you can be 99.99% accurate, but if you miss by a millimeter on every shot, you’ll eventually end up in the next county. However, they’re not just focused on building better qubits; they’re also trying to build an entire quantum ecosystem. This involves a series of acquisitions, a strategy that, while ambitious, also carries a certain risk. It’s a bit like trying to assemble a complex puzzle – you can have all the pieces, but if they don’t quite fit together, you’re still stuck with a mess.

The acquisition of Oxford Ionics was aimed at improving accuracy, while other deals target networking, satellite distribution, and quantum sensing. Most notably, their pending acquisition of SkyWater Technology, a semiconductor foundry specializing in quantum computing, is particularly interesting. Owning their own foundry would give IonQ greater control over the manufacturing process and potentially lower costs. It’s a vertically integrated strategy, which, while potentially beneficial, also requires significant capital and expertise. It’s a bit like deciding to grow your own wheat, mill your own flour, and bake your own bread – a lot of work, but potentially rewarding if you get it right.

So, could investing in IonQ “set you up for life”? It’s a tantalizing thought, but also a highly speculative one. Quantum computing is still in its infancy, and there are many technological hurdles to overcome. The market is crowded with competitors, and the path to profitability is uncertain. It’s a high-risk, high-reward investment, and one that should be approached with caution. Remember, even the most promising technologies can fail, and there are no guarantees in the stock market. It’s a bit like betting on a horse race – you might win big, but you’re just as likely to lose your shirt.

Read More

2026-02-13 00:55