Trump Mania Helps $MAGA Trader Turn $535K into $2.7 Million in 72 Hours

As a researcher with a background in blockchain analysis, I find the story of the trader “0x303” and their massive profit from trading MAGA memecoins intriguing but also raises some concerns. The potential for gains in the memecoin market can indeed be substantial, as demonstrated by this trader’s experience. However, the speed and size of their profits have led many to question if there may have been insider information involved.


In the unpredictable realm of meme coins, riches can be amassed and squandered in the twinkling of an eye. A shrewd investor, identified merely by their wallet address “0x303,” showcased the possibility of immense profits in this tumultuous market by transforming a $535,000 stake in the MAGA (TRUMP) memecoin into a breathtaking $2.7 million windfall within a mere three-day span.

I analyzed a post from Lookonchain’s X account (previously Twitter), where they revealed that a trader bought approximately six billion MAGA tokens on May 25th for around $537,500. Shortly thereafter, within ten minutes, the trader sold over 1.5 billion MAGA tokens for USDT worth roughly $744,000, resulting in a substantial profit. At the time of the report, the trader owned approximately 4.5 billion MAGA tokens, valued at an estimated $2.51 million.

This trader managed to make a profit of $2.7 million from trading $MAGA in only 3 days, resulting in a remarkable return on investment of 505%!He initially invested $537,500 to purchase 6 billion dollars’ worth of $MAGA on May 24 and May 25.Just moments ago, he sold 1.5 billion dollars’ worth of $MAGA for 744 thousand USDT to realize his profits.Currently, he owns 4.5 billion dollars’ worth of $MAGA, valued at approximately $2.51 million.— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) May 27, 2024

As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed the buzz surrounding the MAGA token lately. Remarkably, its price has spiked due to endorsements from Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. On May 9th, I witnessed an astounding 78% intraday price surge for this token. The trading volume also skyrocketed by over 62%, reaching a staggering $281 million. This significant surge came after Trump expressed his approval of cryptocurrencies during an exclusive event for Trump NFT holders at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.

i asked donald trump how he’s going to keep crypto businesses in america.

sounds bullish 🇺🇸

— Malcolm (33.3%) (@macdegods) May 9, 2024

At the recent gathering, I fielded queries from the astute cryptocurrency community, with Trump openly expressing his readiness to receive campaign contributions in Bitcoin and other digital assets. He also voiced his concerns regarding the current administration, specifically targeting President Biden and SEC Chair Gary Gensler, whom he perceived as lacking knowledge and displaying hostility towards the crypto sector.

BREAKING: DONALD TRUMP IS FINE WITH CRYPTO — Frank (@frankdegods) May 9, 2024

As an analyst, I’ve noticed that the recent successes of MAGA traders have sparked both awe and skepticism among investors. Some individuals on social media platforms have raised concerns about potential insider trading, wondering how someone could confidently invest such substantial sums in a memecoin without possessing exclusive information. Lookonchain, a blockchain analysis firm, added fuel to the speculation last week when they reported that an insider had been selling MAGA memecoins. This insider had previously spent 5.35 Ether to purchase approximately 33% of the MAGA supply using 22 distinct wallets.

As a researcher examining this issue, I’ve come across some intriguing suggestions from users that the observed transactions might not necessarily be indicative of insider trading. Instead, they propose the possibility of Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) bots being responsible for these trades. MEV bots are sophisticated algorithms designed to exploit arbitrage opportunities in decentralized finance markets, generating substantial profits through their activities. These bots’ actions could potentially explain the seemingly prescient nature of some transactions.

Read More

2024-05-27 18:55