MSGS: A Calculated Gamble on Spectacle

by

Madison Square Garden Sports

On the tenth of February, 2026 – a date which, according to certain numerologists, portends either great fortune or an unusually high demand for hot dogs1 – Reinhart Partners made a rather substantial declaration of intent. They acquired a stake in Madison Square Garden Sports Corp (MSGS), to the tune of 214,891 shares. That’s roughly equivalent to the number of pigeons roosting atop Grand Central Terminal, give or take a few with particularly adventurous travel plans. The estimated cost? A respectable $55.59 million. A sum which, if laid end-to-end in dollar bills, would stretch from Manhattan to… well, probably just New Jersey. But a good stretch nonetheless.

The Spectacle and the Spreadsheet

Reinhart Partners, a firm known for its discerning eye and a fondness for companies that involve shouting and brightly coloured clothing, clearly believes MSGS has potential. And potential, dear reader, is a slippery thing. It’s like trying to herd cats wearing roller skates. But let’s examine the beast. MSGS, for those unfamiliar with the modern colosseum, owns the New York Knicks and the New York Rangers. Teams that, shall we say, inspire passionate, occasionally bewildered, loyalty. They also dabble in development leagues and, naturally, esports. Because if you can’t win on the ice or the court, you can at least dominate in a virtual realm where the laws of physics are merely suggestions.

The initial investment valued the stake at $55.59 million, calculated based on quarterly averages. A perfectly reasonable method, of course, assuming the quarter in question wasn’t plagued by unexpected meteor showers or a sudden surge in the price of inflatable bananas2. As of the same date, MSGS shares were trading at $279.76, a rather impressive 34.3% increase over the previous year. Which, in the volatile world of sports franchises, is akin to discovering a stable portal to another dimension.

Numbers and Narratives

Let’s delve into the less glamorous, but equally important, figures. MSGS boasts a market capitalization of $6.73 billion and revenue of $1.07 billion. However, a quick glance reveals a net income of… well, a loss of $16.56 million. A situation not entirely uncommon for organizations built on the backs of highly-paid athletes and the unwavering optimism of fans. It’s a bit like running a bakery staffed entirely by pastry chefs who are convinced they can fly. Delicious, but potentially unsustainable.

Here’s a snapshot of Reinhart Partners’ top holdings post-transaction:

  • NASDAQ: FCNCA: $167.04 million (5.0% of AUM)
  • NASDAQ: SIMO: $145.85 million (4.4% of AUM)
  • NYSE: YETI: $134.08 million (4.0% of AUM)
  • NASDAQ: IDCC: $132.97 million (4.0% of AUM)
  • NASDAQ: ACLS: $127.73 million (3.8% of AUM)

The Future of Fandom

The key here, as with any investment in spectacle, is the narrative. The world is increasingly hungry for experiences, for shared moments of triumph and despair. And sports, for all its inherent absurdity, provides that in abundance. The rise of streaming services has only intensified this demand. Everyone wants a piece of the action, and they’re willing to pay handsomely for it. MSGS, with its iconic teams and prime location, is well-positioned to capitalize on this trend. They are, in essence, selling dreams – and dreams, dear reader, are remarkably resilient to economic downturns.

However, caution is advised. MSGS remains a relatively small player in a fiercely competitive landscape. Their lack of consistent profitability is a concern. And the inherent unpredictability of sports – the rogue bounce of a ball, the questionable call by a referee, the sudden retirement of a star player – adds another layer of risk.

Nevertheless, for those willing to take a calculated gamble, MSGS offers a compelling opportunity. It’s a bet on the enduring power of fandom, on the human need for heroes and villains, and on the sheer, unadulterated joy of watching a really good game.

1 The numerological significance of February 10th is, naturally, hotly debated. Some claim it’s a day of unprecedented luck. Others believe it’s a harbinger of mild indigestion. The truth, as always, is probably somewhere in between.

2 The inflatable banana shortage of 2025 was a dark time for many. It highlighted our dependence on novelty items and the fragility of global supply chains. Lessons were learned. Mostly about the importance of hoarding.

Read More

2026-02-12 19:16