Leveraged ETFs: A Curious Case of Risk

by

Exchange-traded funds, or ETFs, are, generally speaking, a perfectly sensible invention. They allow you, the investor, to spread your bets a little, to dabble in the entire market, or a slice of it, without having to spend your days meticulously researching individual companies. Vanguard’s S&P 500 ETF, for example, is like buying a tiny piece of all the biggest businesses in America. The Invesco QQQ Trust does the same, but leans towards the techier side of things. It’s all rather… tidy. And, for most people, that’s precisely the point.

The market, of course, has a knack for taking perfectly sensible things and twisting them into something… less so. And that brings us to leveraged ETFs. Now, these aren’t inherently bad. It’s just that they operate on a principle that seems, upon even a moment’s thought, a bit like building a house of cards during an earthquake. Warren Buffett, a man who’s made a career of sensible things, once said something along the lines of picking good stocks and holding onto them. Solid advice. But leveraged ETFs… well, they’re more about trying to time the earthquake, and then betting everything on it.

The basic idea is simple enough. These ETFs aim to amplify the returns of an underlying index – double it, triple it, even more. Direxion’s Daily S&P 500 Bull 3x Shares, for instance, attempts to deliver three times the daily gain of the S&P 500. Sounds appealing, doesn’t it? It’s a bit like saying, “I want all the upside, and none of the downside.” Which, as anyone with even a passing acquaintance with reality knows, is rarely, if ever, how things work.

Loading widget...

To achieve this amplification, they employ derivatives – swaps, futures, things that sound complicated because, frankly, they are. It’s a bit like a magician’s trick: lots of hidden levers and mirrors, and the end result is… potentially illusory. They essentially borrow money to increase their exposure. If they want to invest $100 million, they might get a bank to lend them another $200 million via something called a “total return swap.” It’s a clever bit of financial engineering, but it comes with a cost – and not just in interest payments. These swaps aren’t long-term commitments; they reset daily. Which means that a good day can be magnified, but so can a bad one. It’s like driving a car with a really powerful accelerator and equally powerful brakes. Fun for a bit, but potentially disastrous if you’re not paying attention.

In a relentlessly rising market, these ETFs can indeed outperform. But markets don’t go up in a straight line. They wobble, they dip, they occasionally plummet. And it’s during those wobbles and dips that leveraged ETFs tend to… unravel. A few days of choppy trading can wipe out weeks of gains, and leave you with a rather unpleasant hole in your portfolio. Plus, they charge higher fees, because all this financial wizardry isn’t free. It’s a bit like paying extra for the privilege of taking a bigger risk.

These ETFs aren’t necessarily bad investments, mind you. They’re just… unsuitable for most people. They’re best suited for short-term traders, people who are actively trying to time the market – a pursuit that, historically, has been about as successful as predicting the weather. For long-term investors, they’re a bit like playing with fire. A bullish leveraged ETF might seem tempting during a prolonged bull market, but it’s a bit like thinking you’ve mastered a wild animal. It might be docile for a while, but eventually, it’s going to bite.

Why Aren’t Leveraged ETFs Reliable Investments?

Let’s say you believe the S&P 500 is going to keep rising for the next decade. Buying a leveraged ETF might seem like a quick way to get rich. And, over the past ten years, Direxion’s Daily S&P 500 Bull 3x Shares has indeed delivered impressive returns. But those returns came at a price. You would have had to stomach some truly terrifying daily downturns – three times as steep as the index’s – without panicking and selling your shares. And that, for most people, is a tall order.

And then there are the even more reckless leveraged ETFs that target individual stocks. Direxion’s Nvidia Daily Bull 2x, for example, aims to double Nvidia’s daily gains. Now, Nvidia is a remarkable company, and it’s likely to keep growing as the AI market expands. But trying to double its daily gains through a leveraged ETF is… well, it’s greedy. It’s like betting your entire fortune on a single roll of the dice. It might pay off, but it’s far more likely to leave you with nothing.

Leveraged ETFs might appeal to certain short-term traders, but they’re simply too speculative for most long-term investors. Doubling or tripling the daily gains of a single index or stock might sound wonderful in theory, but most people can’t stomach those volatile swings and losses. And, frankly, neither should they. There are plenty of perfectly sensible ways to invest in the market without resorting to financial alchemy. Sometimes, the simplest approach is the best.

Read More

2026-02-11 19:44