Bonds and Boredom: SCHQ & SPLB

The modern investor, adrift in a sea of financial contrivances, often finds himself contemplating the merits of debt. Two such offerings, the State Street SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) and the Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ), present a rather predictable dichotomy: safety versus aspiration. One offers the anaesthetic of government guarantees, the other a slightly more robust, if inherently precarious, yield. Both, naturally, are presented as pathways to prosperity.

Both funds dabble in the long end of the bond market – a realm where duration, and thus sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations, becomes rather pronounced. The appeal, ostensibly, lies in anticipating a shift in the yield curve. Though one suspects many investors simply seek a place to park capital whilst awaiting the inevitable, and usually disappointing, returns of more adventurous ventures. The differences, as we shall see, are subtle, yet potentially significant, for those who deign to notice.

A Snapshot of Austerity

Metric SPLB SCHQ
Issuer SPDR Schwab
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.03%
1-yr return (as of 1/30/2026) 6.47% 4.17%
Dividend yield 5.2% 4.6%
Beta 0.66 0.52
AUM $1.2 billion $902.5 million

SCHQ, with its marginally lower expense ratio, offers a fleeting illusion of thrift. SPLB, however, compensates with a slightly more generous yield, a difference of 0.6 percentage points. A trifling sum, perhaps, in the grand scheme of things, but enough to purchase a decent bottle of claret. Or, more likely, to be absorbed by the inexorable march of inflation.

Performance and the Illusion of Control

Metric SPLB SCHQ
Max drawdown (5 y) (34.40%) (46.13%)
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $706 $599

The figures, as presented, offer a comforting narrative of relative stability. SPLB, it appears, has weathered the storms with greater resilience. But one should not mistake past performance for a guarantee of future results. The bond market, like life itself, is a capricious mistress.

Inside the Vault

SCHQ, in its unwavering devotion to fiscal conservatism, holds a portfolio almost entirely composed of long-term U.S. Treasury bonds. A safe haven, undoubtedly, but one that offers little in the way of excitement. Its sector allocation – or rather, the conspicuous absence thereof – speaks volumes. The fund’s holdings are dominated by government securities, with a smattering of technology and communication services thrown in for good measure. A rather dull affair, one might say.

Loading widget...

SPLB, on the other hand, ventures into the more perilous realm of corporate debt. Nearly 3,000 long-term, investment-grade bonds, representing a diverse array of issuers. Anheuser Busch InBev, Meta Platforms, and CVS Health – the very pillars of modern existence. A slightly more adventurous portfolio, perhaps, but one that carries with it the inherent risk of corporate failure. The fund’s high number of holdings, however, does offer some measure of diversification. A comforting thought, though not necessarily a reliable one.

Loading widget...

For those seeking further guidance on the intricacies of ETF investing, a comprehensive guide can be found at this link.

The Bottom Line

Investing in SCHQ is akin to seeking refuge in a well-appointed bunker. Safety, income, and capital preservation – the hallmarks of a prudent, if uninspired, strategy. SPLB, meanwhile, offers a slightly more ambitious, if inherently riskier, path. A higher yield, yes, but at the cost of increased exposure to corporate credit risk. The choice, ultimately, depends on one’s temperament and tolerance for uncertainty.

Indeed, a diversified approach – a judicious allocation to both SCHQ and SPLB – may prove to be the most sensible course of action. Though one should not delude oneself into thinking that either fund is immune to the vagaries of the market. Both, after all, are exposed to the long-duration risk – the sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations that plagues all long-term bond investments. And, as the past five years have demonstrated, interest rates have a disconcerting habit of moving in unexpected directions.

Read More

2026-02-07 15:43