Under Armour: A Most Curious Investment

by

It is, after all, a rather commonplace observation that fortunes are built on risk. But to witness a gentleman—or, in this instance, V. Prem Et Al Watsa, a significant shareholder of Under Armour—augmenting his holdings by some 2,641,105 shares, amounting to approximately $16.4 million, is less a demonstration of courage and more a spectacle of…interest. One begins to suspect a private joke, though whether it is at the expense of the market or merely self-amusement remains, alas, unclear.

A Transaction Examined

Metric Value
Shares traded 2,641,105
Transaction value $16.4 million
Post-transaction shares (indirect) 65,000,000

This acquisition, representing a mere 4.2% addition to the insider’s existing portfolio, is, shall we say, a subtle flourish. It lacks the audacity of conviction, yet possesses the intrigue of a carefully considered wager. The absence of directly held shares in this transaction is, in itself, a statement—a quiet declaration of preference for the shadows of indirect ownership.

The Company Itself

Metric Value
Revenue (TTM) $5.05 billion
Net income (TTM) -$87.65 million
Employees 14,163
1-year price change -18.98%

Under Armour, purveyor of athletic attire, operates, as all businesses do, within the relentless currents of fashion and fortune. It employs a considerable number of individuals – a fact which, in these cynical times, is almost remarkable. However, a decline of nearly 19% in share price over the past year suggests that its efforts to outrun the inevitable are, alas, proving…challenging.

A Most Unfavorable Outlook

One might be forgiven for observing that a consistent lack of profitability, compounded by legal setbacks – the recent loss regarding insurance claims being a particularly irksome detail – hardly paints a picture of robust health. To lose a battle over insurance is, of course, a most vulgar display, and speaks volumes about the company’s current state. Furthermore, the departure of the Chief Product Officer adds another layer of uncertainty to an already precarious situation. It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a company in want of a stable leadership is in want of a fortune.

And then there is the matter of Steph Curry. To lose a brand ambassador of such stature is, shall we say, a rather conspicuous omission. It suggests a lack of foresight, or perhaps a simple inability to appreciate the value of enduring partnerships. One suspects that the company’s current difficulties are not merely a matter of circumstance, but a consequence of fundamental flaws in its approach.

Therefore, while Mr. Watsa’s acquisition may pique the curiosity of the market, a prudent investor would be well advised to observe from a safe distance. To rush into such a venture would be, to put it mildly, a most uncharacteristic display of good judgment. After all, some investments are best admired from afar—like a particularly extravagant, yet ultimately flawed, piece of art.

Read More

2026-02-01 13:45