Crypto ETFs: A Most Peculiar Gamble

by

One is, of course, expected to keep abreast of these… modern investment vehicles. The current obsession with digital frippery, packaged neatly into Exchange Traded Funds, is rather tiresome, but one must admit, potentially diverting. We have two specimens under scrutiny today: the VanEck Bitcoin ETF (HODL, a frankly dreadful name) and the Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ, slightly less dreadful). Both promise access to this “crypto economy” – a phrase which sets one’s teeth on edge – but approach it with differing degrees of… audacity.

HODL, you see, is a direct plunge into the Bitcoin abyss. A rather unsubtle wager on the continued existence of a digital phantom. BITQ, on the other hand, dabbles in the companies around the phantom – the miners, the exchanges, the various hangers-on. A slightly more sophisticated, though no less precarious, approach. Let us examine the particulars, shall we?

Metric HODL BITQ
Issuer VanEck Bitwise
Expense Ratio 0.25% 0.85%
1-yr Return (as of Jan. 24, 2026) -14.30% 17.16%
Beta 2.78 3.2
AUM $1.4 billion $438.21 million

As you can see, BITQ enjoys a significantly higher expense ratio. One assumes the management team requires a larger allowance for bracing themselves against the inevitable volatility. HODL, being the more direct route to potential ruin, is, at least, cheaper to observe. Though, frankly, one suspects the savings will be negligible when the dust settles.

Performance, naturally, is a rather fluid concept in this arena. BITQ, for the moment, is displaying a rather cheerful return. HODL, however, is demonstrating that even the most enthusiastic bubbles eventually… deflate. The Beta figures, both alarmingly high, suggest a distinct aversion to calm market conditions. One shudders to think what a truly unpleasant downturn might unleash.

Metric HODL BITQ
Max Drawdown (2 yr) -93.68% -51.22%
Growth of $1,000 over 2 years $482 $2,023

BITQ, one notes, has managed to preserve a slightly more respectable portion of one’s initial investment. Though, let’s not mistake survival for prosperity. The composition of BITQ is, at least, diversified – 37 companies, dabbling in financial services, technology, and whatever else they can find to attach to this digital mania. HODL, of course, is simply Bitcoin. A singularly focused gamble. One might admire the audacity, were it not so… predictable.

Both funds, it must be said, are remarkably new. BITQ, barely five years old, and HODL, even more of a fledgling. One suspects that a longer track record would reveal a considerably less rosy picture. The risks, as with all things crypto, are substantial. HODL, being the purest expression of that risk, is particularly alarming. BITQ, while offering some degree of diversification, remains inextricably linked to the fortunes of this… peculiar market.

So, which to choose? If one is feeling particularly reckless, and possesses a surplus of funds, HODL offers the potential for truly spectacular gains… or losses. For those with a slightly more pragmatic disposition, BITQ provides a marginally less terrifying, though no less precarious, route to potential reward. But, let us be clear: this is not investing. It is, at best, a highly speculative game. And one suspects that, in the long run, the house will always win.

One feels a restorative gin and tonic is required.

Glossary (for the utterly bewildered):
ETF: A rather clever way of packaging risk for the masses.
Expense Ratio: The cost of allowing someone else to gamble with your money.
AUM: The amount of money currently at risk.
Beta: A measure of how much more volatile an investment is than everyone else’s.
Max Drawdown: The point at which one realizes one has made a terrible mistake.
Total Return: The illusion of profit.
Sector Diversification: Spreading the risk around so no one knows where it all went wrong.
Equities: Pieces of paper representing ownership in something.
Volatility: The natural state of the market.
Crypto Economy: A digital fantasy.
Bitcoin Tracker: A device for watching your money disappear.
Indirect Exposure: A fancy way of saying “still at risk”.

Read More

2026-01-24 22:34