Bonds & Boredom: A Question of Yield

by

The modern investor, perpetually anxious and seldom rewarded, is presented with a curious dilemma. Fidelity’s Total Bond ETF (FBND +0.11%) and iShares’ 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI +0.09%) both offer a semblance of security, a palliative against the vulgarities of the market. However, one, like a distant cousin with extravagant tastes, demands a higher price for its perceived sophistication. The other, a more pragmatic relation, contents itself with modest returns and a distinct lack of drama.

Both funds, naturally, promise stability and income – the very things that vanish the moment one actually requires them. The distinction lies in their methods, a difference which, while subtle to the uninitiated, can prove rather irksome to those accustomed to counting their gains – or, more frequently, their losses.

A Snapshot of Austerity

Metric IEI FBND
Issuer iShares Fidelity
Expense Ratio 0.15% 0.36%
1-yr Return (as of 2026-01-09) 3.0% 2.5%
Dividend Yield 3.5% 4.6%
Beta 0.71 0.97
AUM $17.7 billion $23.4 billion

IEI, the more austere of the two, boasts a lower annual cost, a virtue increasingly rare in this age of relentless fees. FBND, however, attempts to compensate with a slightly more generous payout, though one suspects the difference would be lost in the general fog of inflation.

Performance & the Illusion of Control

Metric IEI FBND
Max Drawdown (5 y) -14.05% -17.23%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $903 $862

The figures, of course, are merely projections, a polite fiction designed to soothe the anxious investor. One can scarcely predict the whims of the market, let alone guarantee a return. Still, the numbers suggest a degree of caution in IEI, a reluctance to venture too far from the safety of government debt. FBND, it seems, is willing to take a slightly greater risk – a commendable ambition, perhaps, or simply a reckless disregard for prudence.

The Contents of the Vault

FBND, with a confidence bordering on hubris, spreads its investments across over 4,400 holdings. It’s a diversified portfolio, certainly, but one wonders if such breadth doesn’t dilute the potential for genuine returns. It favours US Treasuries, corporate bonds, and mortgage-backed securities, with a dash of higher-yielding, and therefore more precarious, debt. Top positions include the usual suspects – Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs – institutions whose very names inspire a weary cynicism.

IEI, by contrast, is a creature of simplicity. It confines itself solely to US Treasury bonds with maturities between three and seven years. No corporate risk, no high-yield exposure, just the reassuring weight of government debt. It’s a rather dull existence, perhaps, but one suspects many investors would prefer dull to disastrous.

For further guidance on the complexities of ETF investing, one might consult a more comprehensive guide, though one suspects such endeavors are ultimately futile.

The Meaning for the Discerning Investor

The fundamental question, as always, is this: does one seek absolute security, or a slightly higher income with a corresponding degree of risk? IEI offers the former, a fortress against the storms of the market. FBND, with a touch of bravado, attempts the latter. It’s a gamble, naturally, but one that might appeal to those who have grown weary of merely preserving their capital.

IEI charges a modest fee and delivers pure government backing, a comforting thought in these uncertain times. FBND, however, demands a higher price for its active management and broader scope. It’s a bet on Fidelity’s bond team, a faith that their expertise can deliver superior returns. Whether that faith is justified remains to be seen.

The conservative investor, seeking absolute safety and recession resilience, would be well advised to choose IEI. The income-focused investor, comfortable with moderate corporate credit risk, might find FBND a more attractive proposition. Ultimately, however, the choice is a matter of temperament, a reflection of one’s own attitude towards risk and reward.

A Glossary of Financial Jargon

ETF (Exchange-Traded Fund): A pooled investment fund that trades on an exchange like a stock.
Fixed income: Investments, such as bonds, that pay regular interest and return principal at maturity.
Expense ratio: Annual fund operating costs expressed as a percentage of the fund’s average assets.
Dividend yield: Annual cash distributions from a fund divided by its current market price.
Beta: A measure of an investment’s volatility compared with a benchmark, often the S&P 500 index.
Max drawdown: The largest peak-to-trough decline in an investment’s value over a specific period.
Total return: Investment performance including price changes plus all interest and dividends, assuming reinvestment.
Holdings: The individual securities, such as bonds or stocks, that a fund owns.
Sector exposure: The proportion of a fund invested in specific industries, like energy or financials.
Credit exposure: The degree to which a portfolio is affected by borrowers’ ability to repay their debts.
U.S. Treasury bonds/notes: Debt securities issued by the U.S. government to finance operations, considered low credit risk.
AUM (Assets Under Management): The total market value of all assets a fund or manager oversees.

Read More

2026-01-24 14:53