Quantum Entanglements: D-Wave & Rigetti

by

The current fever for quantum computation, a shimmering mirage on the investment horizon, has naturally attracted a certain class of speculator. Two names, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS +0.14%) and Rigetti Computing (RGTI +3.72%), have fluttered about the exchanges like particularly iridescent moths, promising, or at least hinting at, a future where calculations are not merely swift, but… aesthetically pleasing. One suspects the latter is a quality largely lost on the algorithms themselves. The air, thick with pronouncements of impending breakthroughs, requires a discerning eye, a palate for nuance, and, dare I say, a certain immunity to hyperbole.

This quantum realm, still largely a laboratory curiosity, suffers from a most irritating flaw: error. Imagine a watchmaker assembling timepieces from spun sugar – the potential is undeniable, but the practicalities… challenging. The very foundation of these machines, the qubit, is a skittish creature, prone to fits of instability. Unlike the robust, predictable bit, a qubit exists in a state of perpetual indecision, a shimmering superposition of possibilities. This makes it exquisitely sensitive to the slightest disturbance – a stray vibration, a change in temperature, even, one suspects, a disapproving glance from a physicist.

The challenge, then, is not merely to build more qubits, but to tame them, to cajole them into behaving with a modicum of reliability. Scaling to thousands, or even millions, of these temperamental entities is akin to conducting an orchestra of hummingbirds – a feat of logistical and technical brilliance, assuming one doesn’t succumb to madness first. And yet, the whispers persist, fueled by pronouncements from figures like Nvidia’s Jensen Huang, who recently suggested the field is nearing an ‘inflection point’. One suspects Mr. Huang, a master of strategic pronouncements, understands the art of managing expectations, and perhaps, of gently inflating valuations.

Let us, then, examine these two contenders, D-Wave and Rigetti, and attempt to discern which, if either, deserves a place in the portfolio of the adventurous investor. A task, I assure you, far more complex than it appears.

D-Wave Quantum

D-Wave, a name that evokes images of icy landscapes and enigmatic calculations, has carved a niche for itself in the realm of quantum annealing. A specialized, somewhat eccentric approach, it is less concerned with solving the world’s most intractable mathematical problems and more focused on finding optimal solutions for specific, well-defined tasks. Think of it as a highly skilled, if somewhat obsessive, puzzle solver. It lacks the grand ambition of universal computation, but possesses a certain pragmatic charm.

Loading widget...

This specialization has allowed D-Wave to achieve a degree of maturity that eludes its more ambitious rivals. They are, remarkably, producing systems for commercial use, assisting companies with tasks such as supply chain optimization. A modest triumph, perhaps, but a triumph nonetheless. Over one hundred paying customers and growing revenue suggest a sustainable, if not spectacular, business model. Recently, they’ve augmented their resources via secondary stock offerings, a maneuver that, while dilutive, provides the capital to acquire Quantum Circuits and pursue gate-based systems. A shrewd, if somewhat belated, recognition that annealing alone may not be enough to conquer the quantum frontier.

Rigetti Computing

Rigetti, by contrast, is pursuing a more universal, gate-based quantum system, a grand ambition that, if realized, could unlock a vast array of computational possibilities. Their modular chip architecture and in-house manufacturing facility offer a degree of control and scalability that is enviable. A vertically integrated approach, one might say, reminiscent of a particularly meticulous clockmaker assembling every component from scratch.

Loading widget...

Their systems boast impressive speed, reportedly exceeding that of competitor IonQ by a factor of one thousand. A tantalizing claim, though one must always approach such pronouncements with a healthy dose of skepticism. However, accuracy remains a concern. While achieving a respectable 99.5% two-gate fidelity, they lag behind IonQ’s 99.99%. A seemingly small difference, perhaps, but in the realm of quantum computation, even the slightest error can be catastrophic. Their partnership with Nvidia, integrating their system into the NVQLink platform, is a promising development, but ultimately depends on the success of that collaboration. A delicate dance, fraught with potential pitfalls.

Rigetti has secured a few sales of its Novera QP system and a three-year contract with the U.S. Air Force. A respectable start, but overall revenue remains minimal. Their exclusion from Stage B of the DARPA Quantum Benchmarking Initiative is a particularly stinging setback, a clear indication that they have yet to fully demonstrate their capabilities. A humbling reminder that even the most ambitious endeavors can falter.

The Verdict

Of these two, I find myself leaning towards D-Wave. Their focus on quantum annealing, while limited in scope, has allowed them to establish a viable business and generate revenue. Their recent foray into gate-based systems, funded by shrewd capital management, is a logical and promising extension of their existing capabilities. A pragmatic approach, one might say, grounded in reality.

Rigetti, while possessing grand ambitions and impressive technology, suffers from a lack of demonstrable success. Their lagging accuracy and exclusion from the DARPA program are particularly concerning. The recent delay in the general availability of their 108-qubit machine, due to fidelity problems, only reinforces my skepticism. A cautionary tale, perhaps, of overreach and unfulfilled potential.

Read More

2026-01-17 15:34