Saylor’s Gamble: Will Markets Still Play Ball? 🚀

by

Right ho, MicroStrategy – or, as the chaps are calling it now, Strategy – finds itself in a bit of a pickle. A properly sticky wicket, in fact, since deciding to treat Bitcoin as the firm’s chief nest egg. The company’s mNAV (microstrategic net asset value), you see, has slumped to a rather alarming 1.04x. Gone are the days of a jolly good buffer that allowed it to outshine Bitcoin itself. 😩

This, my dears, signals a bit of a shift. Strategy’s future no longer rests solely on Bitcoin’s price doing a little jig. It now depends on whether the financial world is still willing to dangle funds at its rather elaborate Bitcoin-centric financial contrivance.

Strategy mNAV Premium Dips Below 1.04x as a Rather Nasty $17.4 Billion Q4 Loss Challenges Bitcoin Leverage Model

For a goodly portion of 2023 and 2024, Strategy was being traded at premiums exceeding 2x, and occasionally even 2.5x its net asset value (NAV). Quite the spectacle, really.

This premium allowed the firm to issue equity, convertibles, and preferred stock at rather favorable terms, recycling capital into more Bitcoin purchases and amplifying shareholder exposure. But with the premium now basically toe-to-toe with parity, that particular flywheel has come to a grinding halt. 🐌

Currently, Strategy is clutching about 673,783 BTC, a sum worth over $63 billion as of the latest report, alongside approximately $2.25 billion in cash. Yet, its market capitalization metrics paint a slightly peculiar picture:

  • Basic- $47 billion
  • Diluted – $53 billion
  • Enterprise value – $61 billion

This mismatch between the Bitcoin’s actual value and the market cap is sparking a bit of a debate over whether the stock is merely undervalued or whether the market is finally wising up to the structural risks of the scheme. Some, naturally, see it as an opportunity. Perfectly frightful!

One chap, Adam Livingston, described the 1.03x mNAV as “the best entry point” he’s encountered. He argues that even a modest 3% premium offers roughly 26% amplified Bitcoin exposure. Rather ingenious, if you ask me.

This is the best entry point I’ve ever seen for MSTR.

mNAV is 1.03.

For just 3% premium, you can buy 26% amplified Bitcoin exposure AND have giga-chad Saylor increase your Bitcoin exposure over time with Bitcoin yield increase.

ATM for STRC about to FIRE all week, leading to…

– Adam Livingston (@AdamBLiv) January 5, 2026

His optimism hinges on a fundamental rethinking of Strategy’s business. Instead of a growth equity venture all tied up with Bitcoin’s momentum, Strategy is increasingly positioning itself as a yield-driven Bitcoin accumulator. A touch dull, perhaps, but potentially serviceable.

Its STRC Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock currently offers an 11% annual dividend, with the next payment expected around $0.91 per share later this month. Not shabby, not shabby at all.

Supporters suggest this transforms the company into a sort of Bitcoin-backed fixed-income vehicle. Joe Burnett, Director of Bitcoin Strategy at Semler Scientific, argues that even if Bitcoin’s price stands still, Strategy could theoretically manage its digital credit dividends for decades. An optimistic view, wouldn’t you say?

If the price of Bitcoin stays flat, despite the supply of USD growing ~8% annually, $MSTR could still cover dividend payments on their Digital Credit products for the next 76 years.

I’ll be 104 years old.

Bitcoin will eat the fixed income market and then the world.

– Joe Burnett, MSBA (@IIICapital) January 5, 2026

In this light, duration, not short-term price fluctuations, is the key consideration.

Accounting Losses Expose the Fragility of Strategy’s Post-Premium Model

This yield-focused pivot arrives as Strategy’s financial statements highlight some growing tension. In its January 5, 2026 Form 8-K, the company disclosed a rather immense $17.44 billion unrealized loss on digital assets for the fourth quarter of 2025 and a $5.40 billion unrealized loss for the whole year. Good heavens!

While these are accounting-based losses, tied to Bitcoin’s Q4 stumble, they have real implications. Current accounting rules treat digital assets as indefinite-lived intangible assets – a bit of a mouthful, what?

This compels companies to recognize impairments during downturns but doesn’t allow them to readjust upward during recoveries. Critics argue these optics matter a great deal now that the premium has vanished. Quite right, too.

An analyst, Novacula Occami, pointed to persistent underperformance, noting that Strategy shares have lagged behind Bitcoin over one-month, six-month, and one-year horizons. Thus breaking the core thesis that MSTR should outperform spot BTC exposure.

In his assessment, the collapse in mNAV premium since mid-2025 has hindered Strategy’s ability to issue “cheap” convertibles and “expensive” preferreds, leaving common shareholders exposed to dilution without much of an upside. A decidedly unfortunate situation.

For all the tweets from @saylor and his faithful herd, the reality is $MSTR has underperformed BTC, not only today (by 0.9%), but in the last 1 month (by 12%), last 6 months (by 45%) and last 1 Year (by 48%). $MSTR was supposed to outperform BTC, not underperform it.

And…

– Novacula Occami (@OccamiCrypto) January 5, 2026

Others warn that continued equity issuance below meaningful premiums will erode shareholder value. Brennan Smithson, among them, posits that insufficient demand for preferreds could force Strategy to rely on dilution to fund both dividends and Bitcoin purchases. A most disagreeable prospect.

People are going to keep defending Saylor’s reckless dilution scheme as long as there is a “1” in the hundredths space.

Little do they know he will probably add a decimal place to make sure he drains every last drop of premium from $MSTR holders.

If Bitcoin has 8 decimal…

– Brennan Smithson (@SmithsonBrennan) January 5, 2026

This debate centers on the question facing Strategy in 2026: can Bitcoin-native corporate finance thrive without speculative premiums? It’s a bit of a long shot, if you ask me.

With mNAV near 1x, every capital raise is under intense scrutiny. Issuing shares or preferreds no longer automatically boosts Bitcoin per share. Instead, it risks signaling frailty if demand weakens. A nasty spot of bother indeed. 😬

The bull case relies on patience. Proponents believe moderate Bitcoin appreciation, continuous dollar debasement, and potential interest rate cuts could gradually restore confidence in Strategy’s yield model. One can only hope.

The bear case, however, warns that without renewed capital market interest, the experiment could falter. Such an outcome could turn Strategy into a volatile, underperforming proxy rather than a superior alternative to direct Bitcoin or ETFs. A rather dismal thought, I must say.

These views make Strategy a live stress test for whether capital markets will continue to fund leveraged Bitcoin exposure when the hype has died down and the premium cushion has vanished. A rather important test, wouldn’t you agree?

Read More

2026-01-06 11:39