VONG Vikings & IWO Intruders: A Growth ETF Tale 🏴‍☠️

by

Ah, the delicious conundrum! Vanguard’s VONG – a horde of giga-techno giants with glistening vaults – and iShares’ IWO – a band of nimble, chaotic small-cap rogues with buttons polished just so. One pirouettes through the ballroom of blue-chips, the other dances on the tightrope of upstart dreamers. Which will lead the reader to gold and which to a sticky, sugared-up mess? Let us unfurl the scrolls.

Metric VONG IWO
Issuer Vanguard IShares
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.24%
1-yr return (as of Dec. 15, 2025) 14.4% 10.6%
Dividend yield 0.5% 0.7%
Beta 1.17 N/A
AUM $44.6 billion $13.2 billion

Beta – that cheeky little imp who measures your heartbeat compared to S&P’s – sneaks into VONG’s column, but IWO remains cryptic, as if plotting in hushed tones. Vanguard, with their meager 0.07% fee, sneaks past IWO with a sneaky fox’s grin. Yet IWO’s yield, though modest as a pocket watch filled with lint, asks the reader to whisper: Is this a Hobbit’s tea party or a dragon’s treasure toll?

Metric VONG IWO
Max drawdown (5 y) -32.71% -42.01%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $2,064 $1,235

Tools of the Trade

IWO, our merry band of 1,000 small-cap minstrels, strums across the realms of technology, healthcare, and industrials – a Bloom Energy here, a Credo Technology there, all playing instruments of heterodoxy until the very last crown is stripped from the Magnificent Seven. Vanguard’s VONG, meanwhile, lugs a chest of gold labeled “Mega-Cap Tech” and pats it like a pudding lady does a soufflé. Over half its assets rest in this single chest, its jewels guarded by Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft – giants with nooses of expectation tightening around their necks.

Ask yourself: Would you rather swim with a school of tiny silverfish or be a bellyflop into the private pond of eight privileged piranhas? The answer, dear reader, depends not on how the current hums but who must handle the buckets when the tide swells.

Rumblings of the Market Ogre

Since 2010, VONG’s 1,000% waves crashed over IWO’s 408%, but the sea has teeth. For these M7 moguls – Broadcom included – hog 59% of VONG’s feast. In S&P’s kitchen, they are merely 38% of the stew. When the gloomy fog rolls in and the Seven Giants are no longer singing jam sessions but playing a lullabye of “Overprice and Despair,” VONG’s castle may totter like a house of cards stitched by a tired seamstress.

Advertisement

IWO, meanwhile, prances about with its fingers full of pebbles: 24 P/E versus VONG’s 39, like choosing a babushka’s scarf instead of a gilded shawl. Though its fee is twice VONG’s, it is still a trinket in a piggy bank of industry averages. The price of admission? A teensy, fidgety risk of slippage.

Definitions, Decoded

ETF: A squirrel stuffing walnuts into a pocket – but pretending the pocket is a cave of wonders.
Expense ratio: The whisper between the rich and the doomed: “This will take sixpence of your shilling just to keep from falling.”
Beta: A leprechaun who hints if your sky is raining marbles or anvil.
Sector diversification: Spreading your confetti across different parties so you don’t end up in one soiree ending in a puddle of shame.
S&P 500: The old grannies who stamp approval on everyone’s test scores – even if the essay is scribbled on the back of a mortgaged contract.

So, which fund to love? VONG: a honeymoon in a gilded cage. IWO: a caravan through the arid lands of possibility. Choose wisely, or be merry, for no ogre roars a warning as sweetly as the market does when it turns.

Read More

2025-12-16 03:50