VGT vs. FTEC: A Tale of Two Tech ETFs

by

In the refined world of exchange-traded funds, where precision and propriety reign supreme, the Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and the Fidelity MSCI Information Technology ETF (FTEC) present themselves as paragons of mutual admiration, yet subtly distinct in their manner of address. Both, like well-bred cousins, seek to mirror the U.S. technology sector’s grandeur, yet one cannot help but observe that VGT, with its broader acquaintance and more robust liquidity, carries itself with a certain quiet assurance.

Though their expense ratios-FTEC’s modest 0.08% against VGT’s 0.09%-suggest a rivalry of the most delicate sort, the disparity is trifling, akin to the difference between a pin’s placement in a gown. Their dividend yields, both hovering near 0.4%, might be likened to the careful balance of frugality and generosity in a household of means. Yet it is in the realm of assets under management that the distinction becomes most pronounced: VGT, with £130 billion to FTEC’s £16.7 billion, resembles the elder sister who has long since secured her place in society, while FTEC, though charming and well-connected, remains a younger lady with promising prospects.

Social Metrics

Metric FTEC VGT
Issuer Fidelity Vanguard
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.09%
1-yr return (as of Dec. 11, 2025) 23.31% 23.06%
Dividend yield 0.40% 0.41%
Beta (5Y monthly) 1.32 1.33
AUM $16.7 billion $130.0 billion

One might suppose that such figures, though precise, are less a matter of substance than of social standing. The true art lies in how these funds comport themselves in the company of others, and here VGT, with its 314 holdings-Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft as its most esteemed companions-exhibits a breadth of acquaintance that FTEC, with its 289, might envy. FTEC’s portfolio, though equally refined, bears the mark of a slightly younger coterie, its 12-year history a mere blink compared to VGT’s 22 years of seasoned deliberation.

Risk and Return

Metric FTEC VGT
Max drawdown (5 y) -34.95% -35.08%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $2,313 $2,292

When it comes to risk, both funds display a temperament as volatile as the London Season, with betas of 1.32 and 1.33, respectively. One might imagine their max drawdowns as the inevitable dips in a ballroom waltz-inevitable, yet gracefully executed. The growth of a thousand pounds over five years, though nearly identical, hints at a subtle rivalry in the art of preservation and expansion.

What This Means for Investors

To the discerning investor, the choice between VGT and FTEC is less a matter of stark contrast and more a question of preference in the manner of courtship. Both offer access to the tech sector’s luminaries, yet VGT’s larger AUM and greater liquidity may appeal to those who value ease in transactions as one might value a well-placed introduction. FTEC, meanwhile, offers a slightly tighter circle of acquaintance, its smaller size perhaps more suited to those who prefer intimacy over breadth.

Advertisement

In the grand scheme of investments, where patience and prudence are virtues, the differences between these two ETFs are akin to the subtleties of a well-turned phrase. AUM, though a matter of scale, may not weigh heavily on the long-term investor, yet it is a detail that cannot be entirely overlooked, much like the unspoken rules of a drawing-room conversation.

Glossary

ETF: An exchange-traded fund, a financial instrument that trades on stock exchanges, much like a well-received letter of introduction.
Expense ratio: The annual fee, expressed as a percentage of assets, that a fund charges for its services, akin to the cost of maintaining a household.
Dividend yield: The annual dividends paid by a fund or stock, measured as a percentage of its price, a reflection of its generosity.
Beta: A measure of a fund’s volatility relative to the market, much like the temperament of a character in a novel.
AUM: Assets under management, the total value of a fund’s holdings, a testament to its influence and standing.
Max drawdown: The largest decline in a fund’s value over a period, a measure of its resilience in adversity.
Sector exposure: The proportion of a fund’s assets invested in specific sectors, akin to one’s social engagements.
Liquidity: The ease with which a fund can be bought or sold, much like the ease of securing a dance partner at a ball.
Fund age: The length of time since a fund’s inception, a mark of its experience and maturity.
Issuer: The institution that creates and manages an ETF, akin to the host of a gathering.
Total return: The overall gain or loss on an investment, including dividends and distributions, a reflection of its long-term success.
Portfolio holdings: The individual securities within a fund, much like the guests at a dinner party.

With a quill in hand and a ledger in mind, one might conclude that the investor’s task is to choose wisely, balancing ambition with caution, much like a heroine navigating the complexities of society. 📜

Read More

2025-12-14 03:08