Beyond the Headlines: Can Simple Summaries Still Compete with AI?

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A new study explores whether traditional text summarization techniques can hold their own against the rising dominance of large language models in the financial news landscape.

Fine-tuning large language models demonstrates state-of-the-art performance for financial text summarization, although extractive methods remain effective for shorter articles.

Despite the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), the efficacy of traditional extractive summarization techniques for distilling critical information from the fast-moving financial news landscape remains an open question. This study, ‘Financial News Summarization: Can extractive methods still offer a true alternative to LLMs?’, comparatively evaluates a range of summarization approaches-from simple extraction to fine-tuned LLMs-using a dedicated financial dataset. Results demonstrate that while extractive methods provide an efficient baseline, fine-tuning LLMs significantly enhances summarization performance and achieves state-of-the-art results. Will domain-specific adaptation prove crucial for deploying reliable, automated financial news summarization tools in practice?

The Data Deluge: Why Finance Needs Automated Summarization

The modern financial landscape is characterized by an exponential surge in textual data, creating substantial hurdles for effective information extraction. Regulatory filings, such as the comprehensive $Form 10-K$ reports, alongside the constant stream of $Financial News Articles$ and analyst commentary, generate a volume far exceeding the capacity of manual review. This deluge isn’t merely a logistical problem; it directly impacts an analyst’s ability to identify critical trends, assess risk, and make informed investment decisions. The sheer scale of available information necessitates automated approaches, yet the complexity of financial language – replete with jargon, nuanced reporting, and potential for ambiguity – poses a significant challenge to accurately distilling key insights from these extensive documents. Consequently, efficiently processing this expanding data stream is paramount for maintaining a competitive edge in today’s fast-paced financial markets.

The sheer volume of financial documentation, encompassing annual reports, analyst briefings, and real-time news feeds, routinely overwhelms conventional analytical techniques. Historically, human analysts have painstakingly sifted through these texts, a process that is both time-consuming and susceptible to cognitive biases. While keyword searches and basic statistical analyses offer limited assistance, they often fail to capture the nuanced relationships and contextual dependencies critical for accurate financial assessment. Consequently, delays in extracting actionable intelligence become commonplace, potentially leading to missed opportunities or poorly informed investment decisions. The inability to efficiently distill key insights from these lengthy texts therefore represents a substantial bottleneck in modern financial analysis, underscoring the need for more sophisticated information processing tools.

The sheer volume of financial data now available demands innovative approaches to information processing, and automatic summarization has emerged as a vital tool for those navigating complex markets. Analysts and investors are routinely faced with extensive reports, earnings calls, and news articles – documents that often contain critical, yet buried, insights. Efficiently distilling these lengthy texts into concise summaries allows for quicker identification of key trends, risks, and opportunities, ultimately enhancing decision-making speed and accuracy. This capability isn’t merely about saving time; it’s about gaining a competitive edge by swiftly processing and understanding the information that drives financial performance. Consequently, advancements in automatic summarization techniques are increasingly crucial for professionals seeking to remain informed and proactive in a rapidly evolving financial landscape.

Extractive Summarization: A First Attempt, But Limited

Extractive summarization techniques, including methods such as Lead-1, TextRank, LexRank, DistilBERT, and MatchSum, operate by identifying and selecting existing sentences directly from the source document to form a summary. These methods do not paraphrase or generate new text; instead, they rank sentences based on various criteria – such as position (Lead-1), graph-based centrality (TextRank and LexRank), or learned embeddings (DistilBERT and MatchSum) – and then choose the highest-ranked sentences to comprise the final summary. The selection process is governed by algorithms designed to prioritize sentences deemed most representative of the overall document content, based on statistical or machine learning approaches.

Extractive summarization techniques, including methods like Lead-1, TextRank, LexRank, DistilBERT, and MatchSum, are characterized by their ease of implementation and computational efficiency, allowing for rapid generation of summaries. Despite these advantages, evaluations using the ROUGE-1 metric consistently demonstrate limited performance, with these approaches achieving a baseline score of only 0.247. This score indicates a relatively low degree of overlap between the generated summaries and human-authored reference summaries, highlighting a key limitation of these simpler methods when compared to more complex abstractive techniques.

Extractive summarization techniques, while computationally efficient, frequently produce summaries lacking overall coherence due to their reliance on selecting and concatenating existing sentences without considering broader contextual relationships. This approach often fails to capture the nuanced meaning present in the source document because it disregards the inferential connections and semantic subtleties that contribute to a comprehensive understanding. The resulting summaries can therefore appear disjointed and may not accurately represent the core message or intent of the original text, even if the selected sentences individually convey factual information.

Abstractive Summarization: Finally, a Glimmer of Intelligence

Abstractive summarization, as implemented in models including Bart-large-xsum, Meta-Llama-3-8B, PEGASUS, DeepSeek-R1, and Mistral-7B, differs from extractive methods by generating entirely new sentences to represent the source content. Rather than selecting and concatenating existing phrases, these models utilize sequence-to-sequence techniques to paraphrase and condense information, enabling the creation of more concise and coherent summaries. This approach requires a deeper understanding of the input text and allows for greater flexibility in expressing the key ideas, although it also presents challenges in maintaining factual accuracy and avoiding the introduction of unintended meaning.

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods, such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), improve the summarization capabilities of Large Language Models by reducing the number of trainable parameters while maintaining performance. This approach allows for adaptation to specific summarization tasks with limited computational resources. Our implementation, utilizing LoRA to fine-tune the Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 model, has yielded state-of-the-art results, demonstrating a significant advancement in generating both coherent and informative summaries compared to baseline models and other comparable architectures like GPT-4o-mini.

Evaluations demonstrate the performance of the fine-tuned Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 model in abstractive summarization. Specifically, it achieved a 100% improvement in ROUGE-1 score compared to the Lead-1 baseline, with scores of 0.514 versus 0.247, respectively. Further assessment using BERTScore yielded a value of 0.728 for the fine-tuned model, exceeding the performance of GPT-4o-mini, which achieved a BERTScore of 0.619 under the same evaluation conditions.

Beyond the Metrics: Towards Truly Insightful Financial Summaries

Evaluating the quality of automatically generated summaries relies heavily on established metrics that quantify their similarity to human-written references. Tools like $ROUGE$ – Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation – assess overlap in n-grams, effectively measuring lexical similarity. However, more recent advancements, such as $BERTScore$, utilize contextual embeddings from models like BERT to capture semantic similarity, addressing limitations of simple lexical overlap. These metrics function by comparing the generated summary to one or more ‘gold standard’ summaries crafted by human experts, providing a quantifiable score that reflects the accuracy and coherence of the automated summarization process. While not perfect proxies for human judgment, these tools offer a crucial, objective means of tracking progress and comparing the performance of different summarization techniques.

Evaluations reveal that refining the $Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3$ language model yields substantial improvements in summarization quality. Specifically, the model attained a BERTScore of 0.728, a metric indicating semantic similarity between generated and reference summaries. This represents a considerable advancement over the Lead-1 baseline, a simple method that merely selects the first sentences of a document, which achieved a BERTScore of only 0.588. The significant difference highlights the model’s capacity to not only extract key information but also to rephrase it in a manner closely aligned with human-authored summaries, demonstrating a marked ability to capture nuanced meaning and contextual relevance.

Further research endeavors aim to refine financial summarization through the integration of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and the utilization of structured Knowledge Graphs. This approach seeks to move beyond simple text processing by enabling the model to dynamically access and incorporate relevant, verified financial data during summary creation, thereby bolstering both accuracy and contextual understanding. Specifically, linking summaries to knowledge graphs allows for a more nuanced representation of complex financial relationships and entities. Expanding the scope of analysis beyond standard reports to include Earnings Call Transcripts presents a promising avenue for capturing qualitative insights and investor sentiment, offering a more holistic and informative summary for stakeholders.

The pursuit of summarization, even with seemingly ‘simple’ extractive methods, inevitably exposes the limitations of any static approach. This research into financial news, while demonstrating initial effectiveness of extraction, ultimately validates the need for constant adaptation – a principle familiar to anyone who’s managed production systems. One might recall Alan Turing’s observation: “No subject can be mathematically treated at all without introducing axioms.” The axioms here – the underlying assumptions about language and financial discourse – prove insufficient without the refinement offered by fine-tuning LLMs. The drive for ‘state-of-the-art’ isn’t about achieving perfection, but acknowledging that even the most elegant systems will accrue technical debt, requiring ongoing maintenance and, inevitably, replacement. The focus shifts from a ‘true alternative’ to a temporary reprieve before the next iteration of complexity arrives.

What’s Next?

The predictable march continues. This work confirms what many in the trenches already suspected: simple solutions, however elegant, eventually succumb to the brute force of scale. That initial extractive success on shorter financial articles feels… quaint now. It was, inevitably, a simple bash script solving a problem that quickly outgrew its capabilities. The gains from fine-tuning LLMs, while impressive, merely buy time. They’ll call it AI and raise funding, naturally. The real challenge isn’t squeezing another percentage point out of ROUGE scores; it’s the inherent messiness of financial language itself.

Future efforts will undoubtedly focus on even larger models, trained on even more data. But the true bottleneck isn’t computational power. It’s the lack of genuinely reliable labeled data in the financial domain – data that isn’t riddled with bias, market manipulation, or just plain errors. Expect a proliferation of synthetic data generation techniques, each introducing its own subtle (and often undetectable) distortions.

One wonders if the focus on summarization isn’t missing the point entirely. Perhaps the goal shouldn’t be to condense information, but to understand it – to build systems that can identify and flag critical events, predict market movements, or detect fraudulent activity. But that, of course, is a much harder problem. And harder problems rarely attract venture capital. The documentation lied again.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.08764.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2025-12-10 11:01