Weapons Rotten Tomatoes Score Nearly Perfect

by

Zach Cregger’s film “Weapons” is currently playing in theaters, and according to Rotten Tomatoes, it has an almost flawless score! Initially, it was a perfect 100%, but now it stands at 96% as only five reviews out of a larger number have been less favorable.

I just got out of the theater and loved it. Watch my reaction on TikTok.

Check out what the positive and negative reviews say below. Read my review here.

What do the reviews say?

The general consensus about the movie titled “Weapons” is extremely favorable. Critics have lauded Zach Cregger’s innovative, genre-bending horror film as an audacious sequel to “Barbarian.” They appreciate the movie’s distinctive blend of terror, dark humor, emotional intensity, and narrative innovation. Many critics draw parallels between Cregger’s style and that of Jordan Peele or John Carpenter, applauding his skillful management of tone, subversive storytelling, and ability to seamlessly transition between scares and laughs. The cast, particularly Amy Madigan and Julia Garner, has received much acclaim, and the film’s chilling mystery and warped fairy tale structure are consistently mentioned as standout features. Although a few critics have pointed out concerns regarding the movie’s pace, tonal inconsistencies, or emotional complexity, the majority agree that “Weapons” is a smart, eerie, and thrilling horror offering that underscores Cregger as an emerging force in the genre.

The positive

The movie “Weapons” has earned numerous accolades, with many praising Zach Cregger’s direction for being confident, innovative, and masterfully balanced, seamlessly blending chilling horror with witty humor and deep emotion. Critics often point out the film’s complex structure, intriguing mystery, and its knack for keeping viewers on their toes with unexpected twists. Some even draw comparisons between Cregger and contemporary horror masters like Jordan Peele and John Carpenter, appreciating his talent for creating a disturbingly entertaining experience that leaves a lasting impression. The film’s cast, notably Amy Madigan and Julia Garner, is frequently lauded, while its blend of surreal visuals, social commentary, and genre-bending tactics are seen as both original and impactful. In summary, “Weapons” is widely admired for being a clever, daring, and darkly amusing horror film.

In a striking declaration by the Tribune News Service, “Weapons” by Cregger solidifies his status as a leading storyteller of modern, mischievous fairy tales that echo ominously like chilling urban myths about the supernatural.

Although the idea of many missing children might initially appear grim and unappealing, Cregger’s diorama of these townsfolk is surprisingly engaging and humorously drawn, with a generous dose of subtle anger.”

– Daily Telegraph (paraphrased version)

Cregger recognizes that screams are almost identical to laughter in some ways, and he crafts his film right at the unsettling border where these two emotions merge. This creates an intense experience akin to the most exhilarating roller coaster rides and spine-tingling ghost stories.” – Washington Post (paraphrased)

The album ‘Weapons’ is so exhilaratingly twisted that once it ends, you’ll find yourself eager to start over from the beginning.

Enjoy a chilling, disturbing experience filled with shocking moments that will have viewers jumping out of their seats, and some that will linger in their minds long after the movie ends. – Movie Review Guide

The negative

The main complaints in the negative reviews are directed towards the movie “Weapons,” particularly its inconsistent tempo, overly complex plot structure, insufficient exploration of emotional dimensions, and unbalanced tone. Despite recognizing the film’s daring concepts and standout performances, especially Amy Madigan’s, critics argue that the execution sometimes falls short, leaving the movie feeling either fragmented or tonally confusing.

The movie’s fast-paced action frequently clashes with what appears to be Cregger’s intent for a slower narrative, leading to a film that seems to fall short of the potential promised by its numerous captivating elements.”

Its propulsive momentum is often at odds with the more patient story Cregger seems to want to tell, resulting in a film that feels less than the sum of its many exciting parts. – MovieWeb

Although the idea is compelling and the actors deliver well, the way the story unfolds, including its comedic elements, falls short, leaving one with a sense of disappointment and craving for additional depth. – Big Gold Belt Media (Lucas Moore)

Cregger’s revelation appears less alarming and seems more deliberately orchestrated, considering he previously prompted us to consider stronger alternatives for over an hour before finally revealing his intentions.”

Paraphrased sentence maintains the original meaning but is written in a simpler and more conversational style.

In the end, instead of exploring primal fear and the misuse of innocence, it seems to evolve into a repetition of familiar horror tropes.” – Paraphrased by AI

This paraphrase aims to convey the same meaning in simpler, more conversational language that is easier for readers to understand.

In Kristen Lopez’s opinion, the structure of the story significantly impacts the tempo, and unfortunately, the third act can be disorganized. However, the acting performances are simply outstanding, with Amy Madigan standing out as particularly exceptional. Frankly, it would not surprise me if she were to receive an award for her performance.

Read More

2025-08-08 03:34